requestId:6852da2f65ef78.85045295.
Metaphysical Learning of Existence, Law and Physical Application
Author: Duan Baoqiang.comChongyang (Shandong Elementary Institute of Confucianism)
Source: Author authorized by Confucianism.org, original article “Theory World” 2023 Issue 8
Abstract: The metaphysics of existence are a fixed explanation of the entire being. The attempt to master existence from the highest and most extensive perspectives. This mastery determines what can appear as an existence in the world, that is, determines from “existence” (yes, being)InheritanceWhat exists. This mastery of the existence of an being is only a path that exists understands, and therefore is only a metaphysical ability. In Chinese philosophy, things are not mastered based on “image-is”. “Use” becomes the unified method of Chinese philosophy in mastering things, which is to use them as the basis for “how”. The specification of the existence mastered from “use” is the “body” of the object. This mastery points to the object and also points to the overall and its roots of the existence. Therefore, through the discussion of the “how” of the object, the confession itself is a metaphysical system based on “heaven virtue” or “heaven principle” as a metaphysical system. Metaphysical learning of physical usage is not only a constructive system, but also a method of understanding and mastering things.
The existence of problems is the focus of metaphysics and the most basic thread of Heidegger philosophy. Therefore, when Heidegger began to think about existing problems, he also had a disassembly and foundation for metaphysics, that is, a thorough analysis of “why is metaphysics” and “the basic structure of metaphysics”. Metaphysics that focus on existence problems are also called ontology (existence theory), and existence theory is translated into “orthologic theory” in China. In addition, the use of Chinese classical philosophy is equivalent to “orthologic theory”, so the philosophical pursuit of the use of theory is replaced by metaphysics that focus on existence problems. However, this understanding of the method hinders the deep thinking of the application theory and will also make Chinese classical philosophy a derivative that simulates existence theory. Heidegger’s thought of existence not only analyzes the origin of metaphysics in human preservation (this is present), but also opens up a new path for rethinking the body. This path not only expresses the certain request for how the physical application is rooted in human preservation, but also shows that it is different from existence.Another metaphysical path to discussion.
1. The occurrence of this and metaphysical learning
Chen Jiaying had this question about Heidegger’s “act structure” proposed in “Existence and Time”: “The leader’s ‘act structure’ is more primitive. Can this mean that the existence who has obtained the ability to “be as” and gain access to things can be said to be a deeper existence? … It is still difficult for us to talk about deeper existences; If we want to talk about it, aren’t we going to talk about it again? ”[1] This question is also expressed as: “What is this thing that lacks objectivity, is not effective and methodical, and cannot be understood by the instrument? ”[1] “As structure” is rooted in the “living world” here, and the “world” is the culprit of various instruments, and the leadership of the existence of specific beings will also be guided by the culprit of the whole. However, Chen Jiaying’s question is whether we can see the previous thing presented by “as structure”. If possible, how can we discuss this thing? This question is not a question that needs to be answered, but points to the depth of Heidegger’s thought of existence, that is, the ability to understand the existence of beings, as well as the existence itself’s apparent operation and existence historical problems. The bridge beam is Heidegger’s dismantle of metaphysics, because the “existence in the living world” rooted in “as a structure” happens to be the mechanism of metaphysics.
In “Existence and Time”, Heidegger’s clear view of “fear” points to the “existence in the living world”. On the one hand, what is revealed in “fear” is the world itself, and on the other hand, what is presented in “fear” is not a certain existence. Therefore, after eliminating the “as structure”, “fear” points to a world that lacks the existence of the being, that is, “no”, “fear reveals nothing. …Fear causes the whole of the being to lose.” [3] However, when people lead to “no” in “fear” and lead to “the whole of being” that is corresponding to “no”, there is a source of this occurrence and metaphysical origin. Because through “nothing”, we can start a request for the leader of existence – “Because the existence as a whole falls away, and then comes in no rush, any way of “existence” is silent.” [3] In the “silence” caused by “nothing”, “existence” itself becomes a problem, that is, “why existent is not nothing” becomes an important confusion for the preservation of man. Therefore, there is a rise of the present of man, that is, the rise of the person preserved in the leading of existence. “Nothing is a kind of energy that allows the existence as such an existence to open up as a person’s present.” [3] The “existence” that makes the existence an existence (rather than “no”) does not first point to the existence of a specific existence, but the existence of the entire being, that is, the “organization of the existence in existence”. In other words, the “how” of this whole is the basis for the existence to be able to open to human beings, and it is also a metaphysical foundation activity.
However, “exist”大官网 become an existence大官网大官网大官网大官网大官网大官网大官网大官网大官网大官网大官网大官网大官网大官网大官网大官网As mentioned above, the concept of “world” becomes the focus line. The “world” differs from the entire body of the existence of an existence in a non-numbered category, but rather marks the “how” of the existence of an existence and defines the entire body of an existence. “The world means: the entire body of an existence, and is also the entire body of an existence of a certainty. This is how human beings are treated in accordance with this way.” [3] The “world” as the cause of beings is the whole being that precedes the whole being. This mastery of the whole determines who can appear as an existence. The “world” is the manifestation of the overall nature of the condition and the basis of the existence. In other words, the existence of an existence that has gained leadership in “as a structure” first points to the “what” of the existence as a whole, that is, “what is the existence as a whole”, and thus a metaphysical departure. “Metaphysics is a pursuit beyond the existence, in order to return to the understanding of the existence as the existence and the whole of the existence.” [3] This can “transcend” is the essence of the human being (“exceed”), and the transcendence is not only the existence, but also the whole of the existence. In other words, this is based on its own transcendence and has metaphysical learning. The person who is focused on the existence is a common entity, and the first is the mastery of the existence as a whole. The whole of an existence is regular, and the one that can be specified is “being”. The specified is an existence, that is, what exists in this entire body, because the existence is the “existence in the world”. The “how” of the existence as a whole is rooted in being, and the thinking of “being” on the one hand is moving towards the most general “existence” (yes, being), so there is a pursuit of “essence-like” and on the other hand, it is moving towards the highest existence of “existence” (yes, being) that collects everything and rejects everything “existence” (yes, being) and “the essential mechanism of metaphysical education is rooted in the unity of the existence of the broad and highest being”. [8] From “essence-form” (such as the paradigm) and the highest being (such as God), the whole being and the existence within it are mastered, and the learning to study the essence and highest thing is metaphysical.
So, saveMetaphysics in the discussion is a fixed explanation of the whole being, trying to master the existence from the highest and broadest point of view, which determines what can be seen as an existence in the world, that is, what is existence from “exist” (is, being). However, this idea: love for a lifetime of life based on broad appearance and the highest object (this highest object is also based on “appearance”) is just a path of existence understanding, and therefore is only a metaphysical ability. The overall interpretation of the existence is rooted in the understanding of existence here. In other words, the TC:
發佈留言